The Tactic is to Bully, Harass and Financially Ruin Inventors in order to Steal Their Patent. Story after Story since the 80's of Foley & Lardner Bullying Inventors to take their patens, many have given up over the years and they see the Iviewit Stolen Patent Story and the Donald Stone Stolen Technology and they reach out and tell their stories. Many of whom gave up long ago because this Mega-Law Firm beat them down, took their invention and left them with no hope.
The Foley and Lardner story seems to be the same over and over, the Same "Patented" invention stealing scheme by a Foley and Lardner LLP Patent Attorney over and over. How does a Mega Law Firm Like Foley and Lardner get away with This Kind of Mass Patent Theft? Well the Inventors that the Foley and Lardner Patent Attorney represents do not have hundreds of millions of dollars and the Inventors that Foley and Lardner represent do not have Political Connections that Go all the way to The Supreme Courts, Connection in the USPTO Office and Connections in the Republican National Committee (RNC).
So if your going to hire Foley and Lardner to "Help You" patent your Invention, your Technology well Then Do so at your own risk. I am not asking you to believe me, I am simply telling the Victims stories and asking that you do your homework before you turn your invention over to Foley and Lardner, you may be sorry - you may never have rights to your invention and your life will certainly never be the same....
Also Check Out..
www.Iviewit.TV
www.DeniedPatent.com
www.MarylandCorruption.com
Crystal L. Cox
Truth Seeker...
Whistleblower
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Foley and Lardner a Motto of High Integrity. Have Foley and Lardner LLP Employees and Attorneys Read the Iviewit Story, the thousands of Documents..
"Foley & Lardner LLP is one of the nation's largest and most reputable law firms. " of Course this by Foley and Lardner themselves. Yet a Thinking person can see that from www.Iviewit.tv and the Thousands of Documents on that Stolen Patent Site, Foley and Lardner are Far from "Reputable" when it comes to Helping or Representing inventors on their patents.
Now I cannot speak for Foley and Lardner LLP on other Legal Issues, however it is pretty clear from the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case and from the Donald Stone Stolen Technology case at www.MarylandCorruption.com that Foley and Lardner are certainly not a "Reputable Law Firm" when it comes to assisting inventors in their Patent Rights.
We have also heard that Foley and Lardner have stolen other smaller inventions, and by smaller I mean from inventors not necessarily with million backing them, it is Reported that Foley and Lardner LLP have Stolen inventions over and over again.
Please Email your Foley and Lardner Stolen Patent Story to me Crystal@CrystalCox.com - I am an Investigative Journalist and my Intention is to Tell YOUR Story.
Email me your court case, documents,evidence, proof of your Stolen Technology and share your Stolen Patent Case with the World.
Now I cannot speak for Foley and Lardner LLP on other Legal Issues, however it is pretty clear from the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case and from the Donald Stone Stolen Technology case at www.MarylandCorruption.com that Foley and Lardner are certainly not a "Reputable Law Firm" when it comes to assisting inventors in their Patent Rights.
We have also heard that Foley and Lardner have stolen other smaller inventions, and by smaller I mean from inventors not necessarily with million backing them, it is Reported that Foley and Lardner LLP have Stolen inventions over and over again.
Please Email your Foley and Lardner Stolen Patent Story to me Crystal@CrystalCox.com - I am an Investigative Journalist and my Intention is to Tell YOUR Story.
Email me your court case, documents,evidence, proof of your Stolen Technology and share your Stolen Patent Case with the World.
Foley and Lardner and the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case
Crystal L. Cox
Whistleblower
Investigative Journalist..
Friday, January 29, 2010
Filmaker Nicholas Holthaus Says "What the Hell is Going on in Montana?" - a NEW Documentary on Corrupt Courts in Montana.
Montana Corrupt Courts
a New Documentary on the Corruption in Montana
is Ready for you Buy.
is Ready for you Buy.
This Feature Length Documentary Called "Beneath the Beauty" is a taste of the Kind of Corruption that Montanans face on a daily basis. Though this Film is mainly focused on Hamilton Montana, the issues are very real to all of us in Montana.
I am a fourth generation Montana Gal and I have seen this kind of Corruption, Ignoring of Victims Rights, Court Set Ups, the Code Blue, and outright attack on the Civil and Human Rights of Montana citizens all the way up to the Montana Supreme Court.
Buy this DVD and find out what is REALLY "Beneath the Beauty" in Northwest Montana and get a Glimpse into the kind of injustice and corruption we are up against where the Rule of Law Does Not seem to apply and Where Truth is No Defense.
Montana Corrupt Courts
www.BeneathTheBeauty.com
Chris Valentine
Nicholas Holthaus
Monday, January 25, 2010
STOP Fraud in the US Courts, George McDermott - Secret Justice - Corrupt Lawyers - Corrupt Judges - Fighting Injustice
"" Welcome to SecretJustice.com, fighting injustice in the state and federal court systems.
SecretJustice.com is the Pro-se meeting place for you to learn how to deal with corrupt lawyers and judges.
The goals and objectives to expose the outright corruption in our nation's courts. Assist other victims of fraud and corruption, deceit and trickery practiced by the courts. To help feeding lawyers steal your property and businesses.
This program is dedicated to ... judges who routinely violate the legal constitutionally guaranteed rights and privileges of pro se litigants in their courtrooms in order to further their criminal activities of corrupt corporate attorneys and fellow bar members of the American Bar Association working under color of law and authority and protective cloak of corrupt judges within our nation's court's ...
The judges who are to be singled out for their contributing efforts in making SecretJustice.com a champion for legal Reform and our nation and for their outrages ongoing deceit trickery and fraud on the respective offices and the peoples of the United States who they owed their booth and allegiance to not the American Bar Association.
Maryland judicial officers to be recognized for ongoing fraud on the court and treason against the Constitution ......
SecretJustice.com is the Pro-se meeting place for you to learn how to deal with corrupt lawyers and judges.
The goals and objectives to expose the outright corruption in our nation's courts. Assist other victims of fraud and corruption, deceit and trickery practiced by the courts. To help feeding lawyers steal your property and businesses.
This program is dedicated to ... judges who routinely violate the legal constitutionally guaranteed rights and privileges of pro se litigants in their courtrooms in order to further their criminal activities of corrupt corporate attorneys and fellow bar members of the American Bar Association working under color of law and authority and protective cloak of corrupt judges within our nation's court's ...
The judges who are to be singled out for their contributing efforts in making SecretJustice.com a champion for legal Reform and our nation and for their outrages ongoing deceit trickery and fraud on the respective offices and the peoples of the United States who they owed their booth and allegiance to not the American Bar Association.
Maryland judicial officers to be recognized for ongoing fraud on the court and treason against the Constitution ......
All judges involved with the Saperstein crime syndicate and its members involving the most massive bankruptcy fraud recorded to date involving Andrew Clifford Moor's bankruptcy case # 88 842746 PM.
And all adversary proceedings and appeals beginning in 1988 continuing all records available at the United States District courts or ask the national archives and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for those wishing to see how the courts protect the Saperstein crime syndicate and its members at the detriment of the rights and liberties of the victims of corporate fraud, conspiracy collusion and corruption within our federal bankruptcy court system benefiting corrupt gangster lawyers and their clients.
George McDermott pledges to expose this corruption and to helping the victims of these judges regain their rights and liberties and properties taken from them under color of law and authority by our out right corrupt judicial system.
Send your support to secretjusticepr at yahoo.com or any other comments.
Yours in truth George McDermott/second-class citizen victim. ""
court fraud
www.SecretJustice.com
Explore this Site, there is a lot here
Check out the Links at the Bottom...
and Take Back Your Courts.
corrupt attorneys
Explore this Site, there is a lot here
Check out the Links at the Bottom...
and Take Back Your Courts.
corrupt attorneys
******
fraud on the courts
fraud on the courts
Posted by Crystal L. Cox ~~~
I am Dedicated to Networking Victims of Injustice, Court Fraud, Attorney Corruption. I want to EXPOSE Court Corruption from the JP, to the District Courts across the Land, to the Bankruptcy Courts, to the Supreme Courts in Every State and our Highest Judicial Courts. Enough is ENOUGH.... the TRUTH should Be Relevant in our Courts and Corrupt Judges, Lawyers, and Fraud on the Courts Should NOT be Tolerated.
corrupt judges
I am Dedicated to EXPOSING Court Corruptions, EXPOSING Corrupt Attorneys - Judges and Law Enforcement - Exposing Corruption in the Supreme Court - the State Bar Association and the Fraud in the United States Patent Office. Exposing the Media that Covers Up Court Corruption while Victims Suffer in Silence - NOT Believed or Heard.
Time to STOP Fraud on the Court of the United States of America. Time for your RIGHTS to be upHeld and the TRUTH to Really Be a REAL Defense in a United States Court Room. You Should not have TO Give your Life, your Quality of Life to Feed their Greed, Corruption, Side Deals, Cover Ups and Flat Out Lies. Expose the Court Corruption.
fraud
Crystal L. Cox ~ Industry Whistleblower
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
STOP Corruption
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Raymond Joao - Raymond Anthony Joao - Iviewit Opposition Documents
Where is Raymond Joao's Counsel?
It seems that Raymond A. Joao is Raymond A. Joao, Esq., Pro Se. So who is Representing Raymond Anthony Joao on that AT&T Patent Infringement Lawsuits he has Launched?
It seems that Raymond A. Joao is Raymond A. Joao, Esq., Pro Se. So who is Representing Raymond Anthony Joao on that AT&T Patent Infringement Lawsuits he has Launched?
Was Raymond A. Joao's Counsel Removed ?
Raymond Joao seems to be his own lawyer, his own patent lawyer and a patent thief
Raymond A. Joao, Esq., Pro Se ?
Where is John Walter Fried Esq. and Fried and Epstein?
Click Here for Raymond Joao Opposition in Iviewit Case
Eliot Bernstein, Iviewit Patent Theft, iViewIt Technologies, Joao Opposition Iviewit, John Walter Fried Esq., Patent Attorney Corruption, Raymond A. Joao
Raymond A. Joao, Esq., Pro Se ?
Where is John Walter Fried Esq. and Fried and Epstein?
Click Here for Raymond Joao Opposition in Iviewit Case
Eliot Bernstein, Iviewit Patent Theft, iViewIt Technologies, Joao Opposition Iviewit, John Walter Fried Esq., Patent Attorney Corruption, Raymond A. Joao
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin Ruling ...
"' Whatever the new media version of "EXTRA! EXTRA!" READ ALL ABOUT IT!" might be, imagine me doing it.
Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin, famously of the Zubulake decisions that were the crucible of modern e-discovery practice, has done it again. In the course of an 87-page opinion and order, Her Honor invokes the only line anyone ever remembers from George Santayana and sanctions 13 plaintiffs for negligence and gross negligence in connection with their--ahem--'lackluster' preservation of and search for ESI.
The Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan, et al. v. Banc of America Securities, LLC, et al., U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, January 10, 2010)
It's a decison that will ruffle feathers in high places. E.g., Her Honor observes: "[T]he admitted failure to preserve some records or search at all for others...leads inexorably to the conclusion that relevant records have been lost or destroyed." (at 35).
Also, while Judge Scheindlin isn't the first to state that the failure to issue a written legal hold notice is "gross negligence," she seems to afford no quarter to effectuating a defensible hold any other way. It appears a face-to-face meeting, phone call, voice mail or course of dealing won't suffice to deflect a determination of gross negligence.
Too, that written hold notice had better be a strong, unambiguous directive to find, preserve and collect, coupled with close supervision of the effort. Total reliance on an employee to search and select won't cut it in Judge Scheindlin's court.
The decision puts a nail in the coffin of custodial-delegated holds and persuades me that, at least in the SDNY, no nabob should delegate preservation and search to minions, and certainly no lawyer should leave search to clients alone.
The opinion prompts further resignation to keep everything--especially all e-mail--and cease rotating tapes ahould someone so much as whisper the word "lawsuit."
Make no mistake: the plaintiffs were no models of probity and diligence. But, reading the particulars of their misconduct, I was struck less by the gravity of their negligence than by how unremarkable their sleepy, sloppy conduct sounded.
Granted, they brought the suit and were duty bound to make production, but think about it: These folks had already lost $550 million to botched investments.
Can't you imagine how thrilled they must have been to devote more time and money to answering discovery requests from the folks that (allegedly) flushed their fortunes away?
They say the rich are different. But not when it comes to e-discovery. They botch it, too! "'
Link to Source and Lots More ..
http://www.eddupdate.com/2010/01/zubulake-revisted.html
Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin, famously of the Zubulake decisions that were the crucible of modern e-discovery practice, has done it again. In the course of an 87-page opinion and order, Her Honor invokes the only line anyone ever remembers from George Santayana and sanctions 13 plaintiffs for negligence and gross negligence in connection with their--ahem--'lackluster' preservation of and search for ESI.
The Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan, et al. v. Banc of America Securities, LLC, et al., U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, January 10, 2010)
It's a decison that will ruffle feathers in high places. E.g., Her Honor observes: "[T]he admitted failure to preserve some records or search at all for others...leads inexorably to the conclusion that relevant records have been lost or destroyed." (at 35).
Also, while Judge Scheindlin isn't the first to state that the failure to issue a written legal hold notice is "gross negligence," she seems to afford no quarter to effectuating a defensible hold any other way. It appears a face-to-face meeting, phone call, voice mail or course of dealing won't suffice to deflect a determination of gross negligence.
Too, that written hold notice had better be a strong, unambiguous directive to find, preserve and collect, coupled with close supervision of the effort. Total reliance on an employee to search and select won't cut it in Judge Scheindlin's court.
The decision puts a nail in the coffin of custodial-delegated holds and persuades me that, at least in the SDNY, no nabob should delegate preservation and search to minions, and certainly no lawyer should leave search to clients alone.
The opinion prompts further resignation to keep everything--especially all e-mail--and cease rotating tapes ahould someone so much as whisper the word "lawsuit."
Make no mistake: the plaintiffs were no models of probity and diligence. But, reading the particulars of their misconduct, I was struck less by the gravity of their negligence than by how unremarkable their sleepy, sloppy conduct sounded.
Granted, they brought the suit and were duty bound to make production, but think about it: These folks had already lost $550 million to botched investments.
Can't you imagine how thrilled they must have been to devote more time and money to answering discovery requests from the folks that (allegedly) flushed their fortunes away?
They say the rich are different. But not when it comes to e-discovery. They botch it, too! "'
Link to Source and Lots More ..
http://www.eddupdate.com/2010/01/zubulake-revisted.html
State Of New York Caused Damages? Bobette J. Morin Vs. the State of New York
Bobette J. Morin Intensley Harassed by the Good Ol' Boys Network ....
Defendents Bryan R. Hedges, John R. Voninski,
William Dowling,Honorable David G. Klim Family Court,James C. Tormey,
Read the Case Below.
Click Here for Court Case
Defendents Bryan R. Hedges, John R. Voninski,
William Dowling,Honorable David G. Klim Family Court,James C. Tormey,
Read the Case Below.
Click Here for Court Case
Many - MANY Say that the Second Circuit in New York is The Dirty-Est Court EVER...
What Do Think About the Second Circuit in New York?
Friday, January 15, 2010
Christine C. Anderson - New York Whistleblower Speaking Out Against "Well Connected Attorneys" and "Preferential Treatment"
"John Lovett, the lawyer for the fired lawyer, Christine C. Anderson, told the six-member jury that his client had been fired in retaliation for exercising her First Amendment rights in complaining to court officials that well-connected attorneys received preferential treatment and that the committee had "whitewashed" certain cases. "
http://www.judicialaccountability.org/articles/lawyersuesforwhitewash.htm
Christine C. Anderson, Thomas J. Cahill,
" Christine C. Anderson contended that her June 2007 firing was in retaliation for complaints she made to her superiors at the disciplinary committee that at least nine cases had been handled too leniently because the lawyers being investigated were politically connected or were represented by attorneys who had previously worked for the committee (NYLJ, Oct. 30, 2007)."
http://www.onbeingablacklawyer.com/?m=200904
Christine C. Anderson, Thomas J. Cahill,
Documents on Court Case
http://www.frankbrady.org/TammanyHall/Documents.html
Thomas J. Cahill
Anderson v. The State of New York
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080616%20Anderson%20Docket%20with%20Eliot%20as%20Plaintiff.pdf
Christine C. Anderson
"Former First Department Disciplinary Committee Attorney Christine Anderson's $10 Million Lawsuit Proceeds Against Corrupt Discipline CommitteeIn allowing Anderson to proceed with her retaliation claim, New York District Judge Shira Scheindlin found that her contention that the committee had "whitewashed" as many as nine cases touched upon a subject of public concern and was protected under the First Amendment. Can New York State residents now hope to see the start of an end to the NYS corrupt courts that harm, neglect, and harass the innocent?"
http://www.parentadvocates.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=7560
Thomas J. Cahill
"A former staff attorney at the First Department Disciplinary Committee has filed a federal
lawsuit charging she was fired in June in retaliation for complaining that her superiors had
engaged in a "pattern and practice of whitewashing and routinely dismissing complaints against certain select attorneys."
Christine C. Anderson, who had worked for six years at the disciplinary committee, seeks $10 million in damages, claiming retaliation for the exercise of her First Amendment rights and
discrimination because she is of Jamaican origin and black."
http://www.legal-disclosure.com/documents/grievanceLawsuit.pdf
Christine C. Anderson, Thomas J. Cahill
http://www.judicialaccountability.org/articles/lawyersuesforwhitewash.htm
Christine C. Anderson, Thomas J. Cahill,
" Christine C. Anderson contended that her June 2007 firing was in retaliation for complaints she made to her superiors at the disciplinary committee that at least nine cases had been handled too leniently because the lawyers being investigated were politically connected or were represented by attorneys who had previously worked for the committee (NYLJ, Oct. 30, 2007)."
http://www.onbeingablacklawyer.com/?m=200904
Christine C. Anderson, Thomas J. Cahill,
Documents on Court Case
http://www.frankbrady.org/TammanyHall/Documents.html
Thomas J. Cahill
Anderson v. The State of New York
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080616%20Anderson%20Docket%20with%20Eliot%20as%20Plaintiff.pdf
Christine C. Anderson
"Former First Department Disciplinary Committee Attorney Christine Anderson's $10 Million Lawsuit Proceeds Against Corrupt Discipline CommitteeIn allowing Anderson to proceed with her retaliation claim, New York District Judge Shira Scheindlin found that her contention that the committee had "whitewashed" as many as nine cases touched upon a subject of public concern and was protected under the First Amendment. Can New York State residents now hope to see the start of an end to the NYS corrupt courts that harm, neglect, and harass the innocent?"
http://www.parentadvocates.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=7560
Thomas J. Cahill
"A former staff attorney at the First Department Disciplinary Committee has filed a federal
lawsuit charging she was fired in June in retaliation for complaining that her superiors had
engaged in a "pattern and practice of whitewashing and routinely dismissing complaints against certain select attorneys."
Christine C. Anderson, who had worked for six years at the disciplinary committee, seeks $10 million in damages, claiming retaliation for the exercise of her First Amendment rights and
discrimination because she is of Jamaican origin and black."
http://www.legal-disclosure.com/documents/grievanceLawsuit.pdf
Christine C. Anderson, Thomas J. Cahill
Thursday, January 14, 2010
New York Second Circuit - the Number One Judicial Hell Hole in America According to Readers.
This Blog will Talk About Thomas Cahill, Christine C. Anderson Whistleblower, Judge Shira Scheindlin, Eliot Bernstein, the Iviewit Stolen Patent,Proskauer Rose, the New York Stock Market, the New York Attorney Fraternity and More Coming Soon..
Got Something to Say - Email Me At Crystal@CrystalCox.com
I will Write about other "Judicial Hell Holes" at some point in the Future, however, I have polled my Readers to some degree and it seemst that New York's Second Circuit Court is the Winner for the Number US Judicial Hell Hole.
More on the Iviewit Case at www.Iviewit.TV or www.DeniedPatent.com
Other Great Expose the Court Blogs and Sites are...
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/
http://www.makeourofficialsaccountable.com/
http://www.parentadvocates.org/
http://www.newyorkcourtcorruption.blogspot.com/
Much More Coming SOON...
Got Something to Say - Email Me At Crystal@CrystalCox.com
I will Write about other "Judicial Hell Holes" at some point in the Future, however, I have polled my Readers to some degree and it seemst that New York's Second Circuit Court is the Winner for the Number US Judicial Hell Hole.
More on the Iviewit Case at www.Iviewit.TV or www.DeniedPatent.com
Other Great Expose the Court Blogs and Sites are...
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/
http://www.makeourofficialsaccountable.com/
http://www.parentadvocates.org/
http://www.newyorkcourtcorruption.blogspot.com/
Much More Coming SOON...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)