Proskauer Rose LLP, Proskauer Law Firm, Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud.. IViewit is Next. 13 Trillion Dollar Scandal, USPTO, DOJ, SEC, knows of Massive Shareholder Fraud.

"Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud in R. Allen Stanford Ponzi by Court Receiver for Victims Ralph Janvey.

Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court involving direct ties to the Iviewit Stolen Patents and Sir R. Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, Galleon, Dreier, MF Global scams and more.

Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud in R. Allen Stanford Ponzi by Court Receiver for Victims Ralph Janvey.

Stanford Trial Drags Former Proskauer, Chadbourne Partner Back into Spotlight
Brian Baxter The American Lawyer February 8, 2012

View Article Click Below
http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202541880071&slreturn=1

—–
Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court involving direct ties to the Iviewit Stolen Patents and Sir R. Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, Galleon, Dreier, MF Global scams and more
—

IVIEWIT DRAFT MOTION TO SECOND CIRCUIT COURT 

OF APPEALS OF CONFLICTS

Case No. 08-4873-CV

—-

United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit
Justices: Debra Ann Livingston, Richard C. Wesley, Peter W. Hall and- Ralph K. Winter, Jr.

—-

Eliot Ivan Bernstein, Pro Se Plaintiff – Appellant

–v–

Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee et al. Defendants / Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CASE 07 Civ. 11196 (Shira Anne Scheindlin)

LEGALLY Related Case to Iviewit RICO by Federal Judge Shira A. Scheindlin to:

(07 Civ. 9599) (SAS-AJP) WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT of Christine C. Anderson, Esq. v. the State of New York, et al.
(Anderson, a Former New York Supreme Court Attorney)

Cases Legally Related to Anderson / Iviewit:

1. 08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT

2. Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.

3. Esposito v The State of New York, et al.

4. McKeown v The State of New York, et al.

5. Related Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY

6. 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT which other cases have been marked legally “related” to by Fed. Judge Shira A. Scheindlin

7. 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.

8. 07cv11612 Esposito v The State of New York, et al.

9. 08cv00526 Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.

10. 08cv02391 McKeown v The State of New York, et al.

11. 08cv02852 Galison v The State of New York, et al.

12. 08cv03305 Carvel v The State of New York, et al.

13. 08cv4053 Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.

14. 08cv4438 Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.

15. 08 cv 6368 John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York

16. 06cv05169 McNamara v The State of New York, et al.

ELIOT IVAN BERNSTEIN, PRO SE
2753 N.W. 34TH STREET BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33434-3459
(561) 245.8588 (o) / (561) 886.7628 (c) / (561) 245-8644 (f)
iviewit@iviewit.tv / www.iviewit.tv

Table of Contents

Conflict of Interest (COI) Disclosure Form… 6

Motion to.. 22

I. Introduction.. 23

a. Christine c. Anderson, Esq., new york supreme court attorney Whistleblower Testimony Reveals a Criminal RICO Cartel Coup D’ÉTAT on government at the highest outposts of law and regulation.. 23

b. Meet the coupsters.. 26

c. The Controlled Demolition of World Markets by Attorneys at Law operating as a criminal rico enterprise and infiltrating senior pUBLIC offices, including within the department of justice and the courts.. 39

d. Where is the Justice? THe CRIMINAL role of this court in AIDING AND ABETTING the criminal rico enterprise.. 48

II. IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL Justices and other Members of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals ( this Court ) whom have currently acted in this Lawsuit in anyway whatsoever, for their part in Aiding and Abetting Fraud on the Court, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process, HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS and more.. 69

III. Remand, Halt and Rehear this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit due to the New York State Attorney General’s now Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest, both past and present, in acting ILLEGALLY as Counsel their office and additionally for 39 plus State Defendant/Actors in this Lawsuit, by Violating Public Office Rules & Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law 83

IV. Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson’s Felony Criminal Allegations against SENIOR Court Officials, Public Officials and more. 92

HALT THIS LAWSUIT and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, pending investigations of Whistleblower Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL Allegations against Members of, the New York Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, Justices of the courts, Officers of the New York Supreme Court, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Departments, officers of the new york supreme court disciplinary departments and others, based on FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS in US Federal Court and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee.

 The Felony Crimes alleged by Anderson, directly relate to this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, including having several identical New York State Public Official Actor/Defendants and the allegations are wholly germane to the nexus of the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit Crimes alleged. Further the two lawsuits are “Legally Related” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin. 96

V. Remove and report ALL other Conflicts of Interest, violations of public office rules, violations of judicial cannons, attorney conduct codes and state and federal law, currently in place in this RICO Lawsuit and related cases, in order to impart fair and impartial DUE PROCESS UNDER LAW… 96

VI.   DEMAND that ALL parties to this Lawsuit going forward, including but not limited to, Court Justices & Officials, Attorneys at Law, Prosecutors, Clerks, etc. sign Affirmed Conflict of Interest Disclosures, identical to the one attached herein, acknowledging PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES for any violation, prior to, ANY further Action by ANYONE in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit. 97

VII.   Demand for Justices of the SECOND CIRCUIT to turn themselves in to State and Federal Criminal Authorities to ANSWER to filed CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against them and served upon them.. 97

VIII.   Alleged crimes ongoing by p. stephen lamont et al. both known and unknown and fraud on this court, the us district court and now other courts including the supreme court and more. 98

IX.   PLAINTIFF SEEKS LEAVE TO AMEND THE AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD NEW DEFENDANTS AND NEW ALLEGED CRIMES NEWLY DISCOVERED.. 98

X.   Relief.. 99

Exhibit 1 – conflict of interest disclosure PARTIAL LIST OF KNOWN CONFLICTED PARTIES. 100

Exhibit 2. 106

EXHIBIT 3 – Criminal Complaint S. 108

Exhibit 4 – Ethics Complaint. 108

MOTION TO:

· Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Attorney General’s now Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest both past and present, in acting ILLEGALLY as Counsel for 39 plus State Defendant/Actors in this Lawsuit by Violating Public Office Rules &; Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law.

· Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Supreme Court’s Attorney Whistleblower, Christine C. Anderson’s (“Anderson”) Felony Criminal Allegations against SENIOR Court Officials, Public Officials et al.

· HALT THIS LAWSUIT and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, pending investigations of Whistleblower Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL Allegations against Members of the New York Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, New York State Supreme Court, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Departments and others.

FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS EXPOSED in US Federal District Court, THIS COURT and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee by the HEROIC TESTIMONY and SWORN STATEMENTS of NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY WHISTLEBLOWER, CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON.

· IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL Justices and other Members of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals ( this Court ) whom have acted to this point in this Lawsuit in any capacity whatsoever, for Aiding and Abetting Fraud on the Court, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process and more.

· Remove ALL other Conflicts of Interest currently in place in this Lawsuit in order to implement FAIR & IMPARTIAL DUE PROCESS UNDER LAW.

· DEMAND that ALL parties to this Lawsuit going forward, including but not limited to, Court Justices & Officials, Attorneys at Law, Prosecutors, Clerks, et al. Sign and Affirm Conflict of Interest Disclosures identical to the one attached herein, acknowledging PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES for any violation, prior to, ANY further Action by ANYONE in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit.

· Demand for Justices and others named herein of this Court to turn themselves in to the appropriate State and Federal Criminal Authorities to ANSWER to filed CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against them and served upon them.

——

Caution! if you have not signed the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure form and returned it as instructed and you continue to act in any manner whatsoever in these matters, Criminal Charges will be brought against you, for Obstruction of Justice, Aiding & Abetting a Criminal RICO Organization and More. see the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form for further information regarding your potential personal and professional liabilities.

—–

I. Introduction

“What country before ever existed a century &; a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.

The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon &; pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is its natural manure.”

The “Tree of Liberty” letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Smith http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/96oct/obrien/blood.htm

A. NEW YORK SUPREME COURT WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY, CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON, ESQ. (“Anderson”) MAKES FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS IN US FEDERAL COURT AND BEFORE THE NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. ALLEGATIONS AGAINST SENIOR RANKING OFFICIALS OF THE US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THE NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY DEPARTMENTS, “FAVORED LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS” [Footnote 3] and names a “CLEANER” [Footnote 4] , as revealed in federal court testimony, a one Naomi Goldstein.

THESE ALLEGATIONS DEMAND IMMEDIATE REPORTING, INVESTIGATION AND HALTING OF THE LEGALLY RELATED IVIEWIT RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT IN ORDER TO BEGIN INVESTIGATIONS TO IDENTIFY AND PROSECUTE THOSE FINGERED BY WHISTLE BLOWER ANDERSON and OTHERS.

—

[3] From Anderson’s Sworn Statement to the New York Senate Judiciary Committee, “Specifically, I discovered and reported that employees of the DDC had engaged in, inter alia, the “whitewashing” [of] complaints of misconduct leveled against certain “select” attorneys and law firms.

This “whitewashing” sometimes involved burying cases or destroying evidence, so that certain complaints were inevitably, unavoidably, dismissed. I witnessed this destruction of evidence myself. Other reported misconduct involves victimizing attorneys lacking privileged positions or connections.”

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=365

[4] “Legal Document: Request for Discovery” Posted on July 22, 2011 by Fred Celani

http://fredcelani.wordpress.com/2011/07/22/request-for-discovery/

—
The “Legally Related” Federal Lawsuit of New York Supreme Court Veteran Senior Supreme Court Disciplinary Department Attorney and Expert in Attorney Criminal Misconduct Complaints, Whistleblower Christine Anderson, Esq., by Federal Judge Shira Anne Scheindlin to this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, exposes from the inside, a legal conspiracy of corruption involving the highest levels of Regulatory, Prosecutorial and Judicial Public Offices both State and Federal. Heroism is a word earned through action. The Whistleblowing Efforts of Anderson, another New York Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower and Hero, Nicole Corrado, Esq., and, a Sitting New York Supreme Court Justice, Honorable Duane A. Hart, Esq., all cited herein, should be the Moniker of HEROISM for others in the legal profession to follow.

These Whistleblowers Expose Corruption at the Top of Government, including the Courts, this Court, the Department of Justice, the New York Attorney General and others.

They further provide the World with an understanding of how America’s Financial System has melted top down, from rigged economic breakdowns and controlled demolition of world markets through fraud, with no Regulators or Prosecutors or Courts to stop it, in fact, all of them Aiding and Abetting the crimes.

Nobody attempting to RECOVER the stolen funds for the PEOPLE, as all of the Top Government Officials charged with enforcement of the Law, appear on the take and part of the crimes according to these Whistleblowers. These Whistleblowing efforts expose how and why no one on Wall Street/Greed Street/Fraud Street has been charged with Criminal Acts, despite massive and overwhelming evidence of CRIMINAL ACTS and FRAUD.

Further exposed, is why none of the Stolen Loot from these Economic Crimes have been recovered back to the People. What is unveiled is a COUP D’ÉTAT on the HIGHEST OUTPOSTS OF LAW & ORDER in the United States and yet not a single story in the Mainstream Media aka US Pravda Press, regarding these shocking allegations by inside Whistleblowers.

Exposed by these HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING EFFORTS is a REVOLVING DOOR between a licentious GROUP OF LAW FIRMS and ATTORNEYS AT LAW, acting in both PRIVATE PRACTICE and PUBLIC OFFICE, working together in CONSPIRACY and forming a RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION with tentacles embedded at the highest outposts of the US Government in order to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE for the CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.

Anderson, Corrado and Other Public Office Whistleblowers cited herein, also provide explanation for why Judges and Attorneys at Law are now desperately trying to grant themselves immunity for felony crimes and attempting to use the State Attorney General Offices and other Government officials as accomplice in the cover-up.

Immunity for ATTORNEYS AT LAW for their role in TORTURE CRIMES, WAR CRIMES and ECONOMIC CRIMES, crimes that include the CREATION OF ILLEGAL/FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL & INSURANCE CONTRACTS that led to the RIGGED HOUSING and MARKET COLLAPSES, that led to MILLIONS OF VERY ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES and left MILLIONS UNEMPLOYED AND STARVING. Seeking immunity for crime, as a legal defense is both futile and an obvious admission of guilt, which will never hold in a fair and impartial court of law?

The attempts to gain immunity for FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS shows culpability in the crimes, exposing fear by the guilty of retribution of the day when the “long arm of the law” swings back.

Fear that they will hang for their crimes against Humanity, their War Crimes (Illegal Undeclared Wars of Aggression, Torture, Misappropriation of Public funds by Congress for Undeclared Wars, Economic Terrorism and more) and they must hope for dirty courts to clear them forever.

Whistleblowing comes at a price to Whistleblowers in this new environment of a CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT.

Christine Anderson, Corrado, Hart and others, including PLAINTIFF have been through hell to bring this INFORMATION TO LIGHT and where this Court should acknowledge Anderson, Corrado and the others who have come forth for their HEROISM, suspiciously, they do not.

These are TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOTS, HEROES and ROLE MODELS OF ETHICS shunned by the very legal system they work in.

We instead find this Court currently attempting to ILLEGALLY DISMISS Anderson’s WHISTLEBLOWER Lawsuit and the “legally related” cases prior to investigations and hearings of the criminal acts exposed by government officials against other Senior Ranking Officials.

We find THIS COURT attempting to BURY THE FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES EXPOSED BY CREDIBLE WITNESSES in a FEDERAL COURT by “SWEEPING THEM UNDER THE RUG,”

PRIOR TO INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRED BY LAW, as more fully defined herein. Therefore, Plaintiff starts this Motion in Honor.

A Tip of the Hat to the TRUE PATRIOTS NAMED HEREIN AND THEIR HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING EFFORTS TO BLOW THE LID OFF ONE OF THE LARGEST CORRUPTION STORIES OF ALL TIME, PLACING MEMBERS OF THIS COURT RIGHT IN THE CENTER of world market fraud and more, A ROOT OF THE PROBLEM."

Source and Full Article

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=594

More on the iViewit Story

http://iviewit.tv/

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

What is the Real Story Behind Valley Stream No. 24, Kevin Chesney and NY Attorney Ruth Pollack ?

Is there any Government Oversight to the Massive Corruption in New York ?

What is Really Going on at the Valley Stream No. 24 ? It is time to find out what "Lies Beneath" the Secret Veil of Corruption at Valley Stream No. 24 - in New York State.

News Article Archive

"By the End of 2007 - 2008 Valley Stream No. 24 had amassed $3.09 Million in Excess Reserves, more then 3 Times the Legal Amount. Auditors found that the district's budgeted expenses consistently exceeded amounts needed, concluding that this was done deliberately"

Click Here for Source of Above Quote and Full Article

So was anyone ever held liable? was the TRUTH ever told?

Big Money - Big Consequences for

the Truth Told about that Money.

Demand ALL Accounting of Valley Stream No. 24 - This is Your Money, What is really going on at Valley Stream No. 24 ? Who gets work contracts, what conflicts of interest exist - Who Is Protecting whom and why ?

Under Freedom of Information, Can't you Request what this Money is spent on, where it comes from and why. It seems to me that if the Millions of Dollars at Valley Stream No. 24 is used to help protect the Wall of Corruption in New York and that if the New York Grievance Committee, New York Bar, Second Department and other New York and Federal Agencies are used to SHUT UP an attorney on a Case that seems to me to simply be about ... some guy getting hurt at work..

Who Got Contracts? Who got Paid and what for.. ??
You have a Right to Know.

What Politicians or Public Officials are paid off, if any to protect this BIG money going through the hands of Valley Stream No. 24 ?

Who Would Kill to cover this Fraud Up? Who would Do just about anything to keep this kind of money, where it came from.. where it is going .. as a "Secret" ?

What if an Honest New York Attorney stumbled on the Truth or took on a Case in which "Discovery" would Turn up the Truth on the ... Valley Stream No. 24 - How About they some how convince the New York Bar, and a Corrupt New York Grievance Committee to simply Suspend the Attorney, take her Life as she knows it and Call it a Day. That oughta shut her up right? Well unless she has any morals or a backbone !!

Did they think If she is Suspended or perhaps even Dis-barred... well then surely no one will believe her right? And Surely if there is No "Discover" in this case, well then we can keep out dirty little ... Secret, Right?

Time to Expose the Secrets of

Valley Stream No. 24

Got a Tip on all that Money Valley Stream No. 24 ?
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

What is the Real Reason for the Absurd Suspension of New York Attorney, Ruth Pollack?

I mean come on she is certainly not a "George Demos", covering a $335 Million Dollar JP Morgan Secret.. She seems to be an Independent Attorney, simply doing her thing... so what in the World did she stumble on that makes these powerful people want to Discredit Her?

Well I will Be Exploring that Question in Great Detail On My Whistle Blower Media Blog Network, Stay Tuned ...

Also Coming Soon EdwardFale.com - to Expose Every Dollar, Every Dirty Deal withing the Valley Stream No. 24 ~ What is it that is so Secret, So Important that the New York Wall of Corruption would be recruited to help cover it up ?

The Collateral Damage in the Valley Stream No. 24 Scandal is many - particularly of interest to me is the Career and Quality of Life of One BOLD New York Whistleblower Attorney Ruth Pollack. And the Quality of Life of Kevin Chesney, he client in the Valley Stream No. 24 Scandal.

Coming Soon the Whole story of what made Ruth M. Pollack New York Attorney andKevinChesney Collateral Damage in a wall of corruption war in New York politics and high finance in which they had NOTHING to do with.

* I will Explore the Question of why so many Travel Expenses with Valley Stream No. 24 . What was Edward Fale, Valley Stream No. 24 Superintendent Really Up To.

* I will discuss Minerva & D'Agostino Law firm and what they may have to Hide.

* The Truth about the Hiring of Therapists without a Criminal Background Check. Who were they, who were they related or connected to... Who is Metro Therapy Inc. and what did they real gain or have to hide.. - Coming Soon..

* I will Explore the "Books" or the "cooking of the books"

* I will Expose all Legal Fees and Professional Services EVERY used... how much they cost and why that person or company was chosen..

* Just who is Anthony Iadevaio (is he a police officer?) and what are the Conflicts of Interest, Money Paid..

* Why was "Computer Access Rights" purged with an Incoming State Audit?

What Makes Valley Stream No. 24 and their Den of Secrets and Financial Cover Ups so important that the New York Corruption Mill is fighting to keep an Honest New York Attorney from simply going about her life and her law practice?

Well I Intend to Find Out ..

These Questions.. and Many more To be Explored Soon.. Check for EdwardFale.com in the near future, or simply google anything on this page and you will find what I am Yapping about it.

Got a Tip

Crystal L. Cox

Investigative Blogger

Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Click Here for More to the Story

New York Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District Leslie Anderson - Reading my Posts On Philip Falcone, Why?

Why is Leslie B. Anderson of the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in New York researching my Blogs, Reading my Posts On Philip Falcone and Harbinger Philip Falcone ?

74-82-64-160.rdns.blackberry.net

19th November 2010	06:33:05	Page View	No referring link www.investigativeblogger.com/2010/11/harbinger-capital-partners-philip.html
19th November 2010	06:35:28	Page View	No referring link www.investigativeblogger.com/2010/11/harbinger-capital-partners-philip_11.html
22nd November 2010	14:15:38	Page View	No referring link www.investigativeblogger.com/2010/11/leslie-b-anderson-second-department-new.html
22nd November 2010	14:16:01	Exit Link	http://www.blogger.com/profile/17987501178539348080

Seems to me that the Same THUGS at the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in New York that helped George Demos, Corrupt New York Attorney - Corrupt SEC Investigator covered over 330 Million in Fraud by JP Morgan and the the Same Lawless Bunch that Illegally Suspended the License of New York Attorney Ruth Pollack as well as helped countless Companies and Politicians to cover up Billions on top of Billions in Scandals...

Well they are Now Doing What they Can to Set Up - Discredit, Defame and Bring Economic Terrorism to Harbinger Capital Partner in order to Protect "Verizon" Stocks, on behalf of Companies such as and CERTAINLY not limited to... Goldman Sachs.. Blackstone and Very Important THUGS and Cronies such as the "Crotty" Family .. Right..?? I mean Connections to Verizon.. Gee that's not a hard connection to make.. More on that Fun Story Later..

So on the 19th of Nov. Leslie B. Anderson, (Cleaner - Whitewasher for Andrew Cuomo) 10th Judicial in New York is researching Harbinger Capital Partners to bone up on the scoop for her newest smack down in conjunction with the NYAG Corruption that is setting up Harbinger Capital Partners and Philip Falcone in order to Protect Verizon for Goldman Sachs and the Other Ga-Zillionaires invested in Verizon and Related Companies.

Which actually protects money that Paul A. Crotty, Former President of Verizon New
York has invested Right? or Stocks.. or ? ... Former Verizon President then a U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York, covering Manhattan - Hmmmm .. I Say - Paul A. Crotty has some Explaining to do.. Convenient Manhattan NYAG Investigating Harbinger Capital Partners and Philip Falcone.. ( Coming Soon - www.PaulCrotty.com - Got a Tip on Paul Crotty Corruption - Crystal@CrystalCox.com )

Anyway.. More on that Coming SOON ~ Count on It. For this post know that the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District is the "Cleaners" for the NYAG - Andrew Cuomo Corruption - ( Note: the Crotty Family put the Cuomo Family in Power - More on that Later) and all this is what protects Companies like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan, and Law Firms Like Foley and Lardner, Proskauer Rose .. as well as tech companies like Intel Corp. , IBM, and media companies like Time Warner Inc.

See Andrew Cuomo pulls the strings on puppets like Leslie B. Anderson and WaLa the TRUTH Teller is Discredited, Set Up and quite often fined and jailed.. OR even Worse.. anyway.. they are harassed so much that they just want their life back so they Go Away.. NOT ME. . I don't go Away and Leave Victims in the Trenches.. NOT My Way.. So .. I am here to STAY..

And Now the Corrupt New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is to Be the Governor of New York, so this Wall of Corruption gets Stronger..

Thing is One day soon the Truth about Andrew Cuomo, and the Attorney Fraternity out of New York will be blatantly obvious to all and that Tipping Point is just about to arrive .. iViewit Technology - Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger and Brave Whistleblowers Such as Ruth Pollack and Christine Anderson, along with many others EXPOSING YOU .. RIGHT now.. Well We See that this Tipping Point Comes a Knocking.. and Soon..

The Proof of Corruption in the New York Justice System is getting bigger and bigger, Whistleblowers like Ruth Pollack, Christine Anderson and more are exposing massive amounts of corruption along with tons of blogs - Andrew Cuomo can only hide his Dirty Deeds so long. ...

Ruth Pollack Testimony

http://www.investigativeblogger.com/2010/10/ruth-pollack-esq-testimony-new-york.html

Christine Anderson Testimony

http://www.ethicscomplaint.com/2010/10/christine-c-anderson-first-department.html

That Tipping Point May Just Be the Eliot Bernstein, Iviewit Technologies Criminal Complaint against NYAG Andrew Cuomo - Governor Elect Andrew Cuomo. What the New York Governors Office Does with this Criminal Complaint against Andrew Cuomo will be under a Major Spotlight, I WILL MAKE SURE OF IT.

Here is the Criminal Complaint against NYAG Andrew Cuomo - Governor Elect Andrew Cuomo made by Eliot Bernstein, Founder of Iviewit Technologies and One of the Iviewit Inventors.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20
Southern%20District%20NY/20101120%20FINAL%20Andrew%20Cuomo%20
Criminal%20Complaint%20Governor%20David%20Paterson%20Cover%20Letter%20
Fingerprinted%20Color.pdf

Or Maybe the Tipping Point on New York Corruption will be the Petition For Writ Of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court - Kevin G. Chesney - Chesney v. Valley Stream

http://www.investigativeblogger.com/2010/11/writ-of-certiorari-in-united-states.html

See the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District gets down in the mud and takes peoples lives as they know it, takes their careers and reputation and all to cover up what Andrew Cuomo .. Says they MUST Cover Up. Which has no basis in Equal Protection under the Law, and No Relevance to the True Facts of the Cases involved.

The Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in New York via Cronies .. Puppets like Leslie Anderson - well they have the power to SHUT down the Truth with the Stroke of a Pen and in the Judicial Hell Hole of the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in the Court of New York - Well the TRUTH is NO Defense... and You Lose.

So Today While Leslie B. Anderson is Researching the Latest Andrew Cuomo, Paul Crotty High Finance Victim - "Harbinger Capital Partners" - Well She stumbles on what I posted about her, last week, which was mostly just a bio with a bit of sass, and was nothing compared to what I had Already Exposed of her corrupt activity over the Peter Sivere incident and the Smackdown of New York Attorney Ruth Pollack.

None the Less.. the NYAG - Andrew Cuomo Thug for Hire - Leslie B. Anderson.. well she just noticed my writings today and well she got riled up like a Rabid Grizzly Bear and Boy did She Screw Up !!!

Stepped Right into Blogger Scat She Did.. You Can See from the Web Stats above that Today Leslie Anderson looks at my Blog Post on her and then admires the Blogger Profile "Queen of all Database" - which is the fake profile she set up today to defame my real estate company, Slam me, Discredit me, Harass me and well PROVE that she can actually "investigate" something if she wants to .. even if it is just WHO Owns CrystalCox.com ~ Which is Kind of.. Well Easy..

So Who is Paying Leslie B. Anderson of the New York Court System to attack me, harass me, post defamation on me ... Well the New York Tax Payers ARE for One.. thing is which Puppet Master has Leslie B. Anderson ALL up in my business and why Today after months of Exposing her Corrupt activity .. why Come for me Today? What's so Special About Today?

This was her Comment. "in part" to not further defame the innocent, I will be giving the Full Document to my Attorney for my Defamation Lawsuit against the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in the New York Court System and Against Leslie B. Anderson Personally.

Leslie Anderson of the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in New York Posted This On My Blog Today from WORK on YOUR DIME !! ( please note the mis-spellings and grammar as well as her slam in My First attack this morning which I will share in another Post, well that was about My Grammar.. and Spelling. ..

Leslie B. Anderson, NY 10th District Grievance Comm. Posts this:

"... I hope that you make a better real estate agent than you do "Investigatiave Blogger"

Your "information" pales when compared to that publically available on networks such as LinkedIn.com.

Less than two minutes of my own "investigative" work uncovered your identity:"

So Slams my Real Estate Career she Assumes I have .... Spells Investigative WRONG.. Slams my "network" and then .. WOW.. Such a GREAT Investigator for the the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in New York - She Uncovered MY SECRET.. Who I am.. the Burning Question on Everyone's Tongue.. Who is this Masked Investigative Blogger Calling herself Crystal L. Cox?

I do Post in my own name Pretty Much Every Day and well uncovering my "Identity" is certainly NOT something such a Powerful New York Attorney should brag about being able to do and so Quickly To.. "Snaps for Leslie B. Anderson" - Good Job ~ You Uncovered my Real Identity... Now What?

Anyway, Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District in New York and Leslie B. Anderson Puppet for New York Corruption... The Victims in your Financial War, Your Greedy Corporate Cover Ups.. that Simply told the TRUTH on Corruption, and turned on a Light in a Room that had lots of bad deeds happening for a very long time - Well THEY will NOT be Collateral Damage on My Watch. I Will EXPOSE you Leslie B. Anderson .. Every SINGLE Act.. Every Law You Broker, Every Indescretion, Every Ethics Violation, If it Takes me a Decade to Do it.. - Can't ya Just Hear them there Skeletons Rattlin' in Leslie Anderson's Closet? Boy I sure Can.. Music to My Ears..

Stay Tuned.. It Should be "Riveting"...

And PS: I do have a Spine, I do have a Good Moral Compass, And I do stand on the Right Side of the Law...I Do not Let those Who Tell the TRUTH be stripped of all they know to be there life and Do Nothing to Get Their Truth Heard, and I DO post in My Real Name.. So Leslie B. Anderson - aKa - "Queen of all database" - You may Want to "Bring Your A Game" for your Next Attack on Me..

posted Proudly By

Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Tiny Little Sidenote.. "I don't Think you have the Stomach for This, "Pumpkin" - and I guarantee you, MY BALLS are bigger then YOURS.. "

Eliot Bernstein Testimony New York Senate Judiciary on Iviewit Scandal, Cover Ups, and Corruption.

Eliot Bernstein Testimony NY Senate Judiciary Part 1
Trillion Dollar Lawsuit, Attempted Murder, Court Corruption
Patent Attorney Corruption, and Mass Fraud on the Courts in ALL
Judicial Branches, the USPTO and Multiple Supreme Courts.



Eliot Bernstein Testimony NY Senate Judiciary Part 2
Iviewit Technologies - Eliot Bernstein Testifies on
Massive Corruption Surrounding
the Stealing of the Iviewit Technology.



More on the Massive Shareholder Fraud and Major Corruption in the
Iviewit Stolen Intellectual Property Scandal ... Go to..

www.DeniedPatent.com

www.Iviewit.TV

www.KennethRubenstein.com

www.JeffreyBewkes.com

www.CEOpaulOtellini.com

Ruth Pollack, Esq. Testimony New York Senate Judiciary Committee. Rita Adler, James Pelzer - New York Corruption.

Ruth Pollack, Esq. Testimony at the New York Senate Judiciary Committee
Regarding the Corruption in New York Courts and the Actions of a Grievance Committee Chair named Rita Adler. Listen Closely, Got a Tip - eMail me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com



Ruth Pollack, Esq. on the Break Down of the System and on Fixing the System. Ruth Pollack, Esq. wants to be a part of the Solution and NOT part of the Problem.

They wanted Ruth Pollack, Esq out of the Eastern District of New York - Why?

Why is Rita Adler above the Law and Sending Documents such as this video discusses to James Pelzer Clerk of the Court, New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division Second Department ?

Who really protects the Corrupt Rita Adler?

Well for one it is George Demos and those hundreds of Millions JP Morgan covered up in the Peter Sivere scandal, where George Demos Covered for JP Morgan and Rita Adler Covered for George Demos.

Who Else Protects Rita Adler's actions?

Well folks Proskauer Rose Law Firm has Cronies in the New York Supreme Court, on the New York Bar and well, in every court really and Proskauer Rose protects JP Morgan, who, as we discussed protects George Demos.. it is all connected and Rita Adler KNOWS that she is PROTECTED to act OUTSIDE the LAW, period.

Also we have the conflict of interest with Rita Adler and Noel D. Adler Right?.

Noel Adler is the Chief Information Officer, Unified Court System and IS Rita Adler's Husband Right? Sounds like it comes in handy to me..

Much More on Rita Adler and James Pelzer CORRUPTION coming Soon..

Source of Post
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUs88vRwD1I


More on Rita Adler Corruption

http://www.petersivere.com/

http://www.politico.com/static/PPM136_100801_dismissal_letter.html

http://www.seconddepartment.com/

http://www.jamespelzer.com/


More on Ruth Pollack Esq.

I Will Not Be Threatened by Mr. Cuomo. Re: Pollack and Chesney v. State of NY Click Here for Document.

Ruth M. Pollack Re: Chesney v. Valley Stream

Appeal Denied, Documents - Files apparently just walked off... Click Here for Denial...

Do you have a Tip on the Corrupt Actions of Rita Adler, James Pelzer, George Demos or anyone involved in this Post?

Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

NYPD regulations prohibit male cops from performing strip searches of female prisoners. - New York Corruption GONE Mad.

"An NYPD narcotics detective is facing dismissal over allegations he improperly strip-searched 18 women - but he's calling them all lying druggies.

Two of the women have filed federal suits against Detective Charles Derosalia, including Claudia Bova, who says he forced her to pull her pants down so he could photograph a below-the-navel tattoo with a cell phone camera.

The married Derosalia is facing departmental trial. Bova and three other women have testified so far. If Derosalia is found guilty of the charges, he'll likely be fired.

The probe was launched after Bova complained about the incident, which took place in a bathroom at the Brooklyn district attorney's office in June 2007.

She had been arrested in a Coney Island drug sweep and later pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge and got drug treatment.

Investigators from the Internal Affairs Bureau tracked down dozens of women who had been arrested in similar sweeps by Derosalia's team at Brooklyn South Narcotics, and 17 others said they had been strip searched by him.

NYPD regulations prohibit male cops from performing strip searches of female prisoners.

Bova's lawyer Nicole Bellina said she was shocked to learn the number of victims.

"[Derosalia] assumed he was never going to be called out on his behavior," said Bellina, who has filed a lawsuit in Brooklyn Federal Court.

None of the women accuse Derosalia of touching them - or himself - during the prohibited searches. "

Full Article and Source
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2010/09/24/2010-09-24_eighteen_women_claim_brooklyn_cop_charles_derosalia_illegally_stripsearched_them.html#ixzz10X35zT1g

Where is Andrew Cuomo - NYAG, New York Corruption is a Way of Life. Southern District of New York

Southern District of New York (Foley Square)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:09-cv-10616-DAB

Jordan v. Lippman et al
Assigned to: Judge Deborah A. Batts

Demand: $9,999,000
Cause: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Date Filed: 12/31/2009
Date Terminated: 05/07/2010

Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Plaintiff : Kathryn Jordan represented by Kathryn Jordan
PRO SE

V.

Defendant
Judge Jonathan Lippman represented by Monica Anne Connell
New York State Office of the Attorney General (24th Floor)
120 Broadway, 24th Floor
New York, NY 10271
212-416-8965
Fax: 212-416-6009
Email: Monica.Connell@oag.state.ny.us

Defendant
Judge Judith Kaye represented by Monica Anne Connell

Defendant
Judge Luis Gonzales represented by Monica Anne Connell

Defendant
Judge Rolando T. Acosta represented by Monica Anne Connell

Defendant
Judge James Catterson represented by Monica Anne Connell

Defendant
Judge David Friedman represented by Monica Anne Connell
(See above for address)

Defendant
Judge Joseph P. Sullivan represented by Monica Anne Connell
(See above for address)

Defendant
Judge Peter Tom represented by Monica Anne Connell
(See above for address)

Defendant
Judge Marcy Friedman represented by Monica Anne Connell
(See above for address)

Got a Tip?
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

New York Corruption - Motion to Re-Open - Court had NO Juristication Due to Appeal. Where is Andrew Cuomo, New York Attorney General?

Iviewit Inventor Eliot Ivan Bernstein Supports Kevin McKeown aka Frank Brady Federal
Lawsuit Regarding Stolen 9.11 Red Cross Funds Legally Related by Federal Judge Shira
Scheindlin to New York Supreme Court Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson Lawsuit. READ

ALL ABOUT IT @ EXPOSE CORRUPT COURTS!!!

Article Courtesy of Expose Corrupt Courts @
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2010/09/federal-court-asked-to-reopen-another.html

Thursday, September 16, 2010
Federal Court Asked To Reopen Another NY State Corruption Case

Plaintiff,

-against- 08 Civ 2391 (SAS)
PLAINTIFF’S AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT
OF MOTION TO REOPEN

THE STATE OF NEW YORK; THE OFFICE OF COURT
ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM;
THE N.Y. STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT;
THE N.Y.S. 1ST DEPT., DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE;
THE N.Y.S. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE, 9TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT;

THOMAS J. CAHILL, in his official and individual capacity; AFFIRMATION

SHERRY K. COHEN, in her official and individual capacity; IN SUPPORT OF
GARY L. CASELLA, in his official and individual capacity; MOTION TO
NANCY J. BARRY, in her official and individual capacity;

REOPEN
FRANCIS A. NICOLAI, in his official and individual capacity;
JOSEPH M. ACCETTA, in his official and individual capacity,
ROBERT M. DIBELLA, in his official and individual capacity;

ANTHONY A. SCARPINO, in his official and individual capacity;
ROBERT A. KORREN; JEFFREY A. MCNAMARA;

PATRICIA BAVE-PLANELL; GIULINI & GIULINI, ESQS.;
CHARLES A. GIULINI, individually and as a partner of
Giulini and Giulini; CHRISTINE GIULINI, individually and
as a parter of Giulini and Giulini; CATHERINE M. MIKLITSCH
MCQUADE & MCQUADE, ESQS.; JOSEPH F. MCQUADE,
individually and as a partner of McQuade & McQuade;
MICHAEL D. MCQUADE, individually and as a partner of
McQuade & McQuade; and JOHN and JANE DOES, 1-20,
Defendants.

————————————————————————x

Plaintiff Kevin McKeown, pro se, respectfully moves this day, September 11, 2010, for an order reopening the above captioned matter based upon new facts, a fraud upon this Honorable Court and pursuant to F.R.C.P. 60 (b) and (d)(3), inter alia.

As this Honorable Court is aware, this case concerns $140,000.00 stolen from American Red Cross 9/11 donation money- still unpaid; What this court has not known, until now, is that the defendants have defrauded this court as they have knowingly acted without required jurisdiction, inter alia, thus void of any immunity.

Background

1. The operative 1st Amended Complaint was filed on May 12, 2008 (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT “A”) On August 8, 2008, this Honorable Court dismissed the action (EXHIBIT “B”).

On May 12, 2009, this Honorable Court found that the Court had no jurisdiction since the matter was on appeal; the appeal was only finalized on August 12, 2010 (See attached 08cv2391 Docket Sheet EXHIBIT “C”).

All filings in this application are respectfully herein incorporated as if fully annexed. As this Honorable Court has only again had jurisdiction less than 30 days, the herein request is timely and, in the interest of justice, must be granted.

A Knowing and Deliberate Fraud Upon This Court

2. The defendants were stripped of jurisdiction in the underlying action on November 4, 2003 by well-settled New York State Law. Their filings and actions are VOID under New York State law. And since they acted without jurisdiction, they cannot by law assert any type of immunity.

CLICK HERE TO SEE FILED DOCUMENT WITH EXHIBITS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
————————————————————————x
KEVIN MCKEOWN,

3. The defendants were aware that as a matter of New York State law, all proceedings had been stayed since November 4, 2003 when a party interested in the underlying proceeding committed suicide. Defendant attorneys Patricia Bave-Planell, Frank Streng, Robert Korren and Joseph McQuade, among others, have knowingly failed to file the only Motion that could ever be filed or accepted: a required on-notice substitution of party papers. (Weber v Bellinger, 124 AD2d 1009). It is uncontested that the required substitution has never been filed.

The New York State law is simple: without party substitution upon the death of an interested party, there is no jurisdiction.

Accordingly, Immunity of any kind does not apply in this matter. All attorneys and State actors had an ethical obligation to advise this Court.

4. Even the state defendants, and their attorneys, have ignored their own obligation to follow state law and to report or take action against those who were violating state laws and attorney ethical codes and, further, who were improperly acting without jurisdiction.

5. This Court must look very dimly upon the attorneys in this action who have failed to bring to this Honorable Court’s attention the fact that laws and ethical codes of conduct had been violated by attorneys and state actors in this very proceeding.

All attorneys were aware that the state law has always been clear regarding the lack of jurisdiction upon the death of an interested party. But these attorneys advanced known void rulings to this Court, or fraudulently asserted immunity claims when such protection had been stripped by the lack of jurisdiction.

6. As alleged in the 1st Amended Complaint, and as accepted as true in the Court’s August 8, 2008 dated order of dismissal, a wide-range cover-up was put in place to hide the improper filings of attorney Frank Streng- a publicly advertised friend, supporter and insider of the judge who accept his improper filings and who himself would subsequently make rulings without jurisdiction.

Without the Proper Substitution of a Party, The State Actors Lacked Jurisdiction

7. It is well-settled law that the lack of the proper substitution of a party in an action renders all subsequent orders null and void as the court lacks jurisdiction (see, Bossert v Ford Motor Co., 140 AD2d 480; Silvagnoli v Consolidated Edison Employees Mut. Aid Socy., 112 AD2d 819) None of the state actors had jurisdiction since November 4, 2003.

Each and every order since November 4, 2003 is VOID as a matter of law (see, Byrd v Johnson, 67 AD2d 992). The defendants’, and their attorneys’, knowing failure to act without jurisdiction is the essence of the denial of due process. And their silence of the violations of the known laws are a fraud.

8. I have no other remedy of law. My filings to: state administrative judges; all higher state courts; all court, attorney and judicial ethical bodies have only resulted in retaliation and threats against me.

Meanwhile, not one entity, including the New York State Attorney General’s Office, has disputed the lack of jurisdiction since November 4, 2003.

The collective silence by the defendants, state actors and attorneys on what I now know as basic New York State Required Party-Substitution law begs this Court’s immediate action.

9. The state actors improperly continued proceedings with the full knowledge that as a matter of law all proceedings were stayed upon the death of an interested party- all in complete violation of my rights concerning due process.

(Brown v Konczeski, 242 A.D.2d 847; CPLR 1015, 1021). Indeed, the attorneys involved have never disputed their collective failure to file On-Notice Substitution of Party papers since all matters were stayed, by law, on November 4, 2003. Notably, not one defendant disputes that all matters have been stayed since November 4, 2003, and by operation of well-settled state law.

10. If the 1st Amended Complaint is taken as true, then the thereto-annexed timeline of the illegal court filings confirms the lack of the required party-substitution submission.

While I am not an attorney and did not know this law when I filed my complaint, surely the defendants were aware of the state law requiring party substitution. Indeed, the involved attorneys (who financially benefited from the fraud), court clerks (who were friends of the attorney who filed the fraudulent assignment) and the Surrogate Judge (who would later recuse himself because of his admitted and advertised closeness with the attorney who filed the fraudulent assignment)– were aware of the state law requiring party substitution.

THE UNDERLYING FRAUD

11. Ronald P. McKeown, Jr., purportedly executed an “Assignment of Share in Estate” and an “Affidavit Re Assignment of Share in Estate” (hereinafter collectively as the “ASSIGNMENT”), dated October 30, 2003, with knowledge that its purpose was to defraud creditors of the assignor, the IRS, the State of Texas, to advance a deception upon the Surrogate’s court, and violate various state laws of New York and Connecticut.

12. In is uncontested that within days after Ronald’s death on November 4, 2003, Frank W. Streng, Esq., attorney of record for Ronald, presented the purported assignment for filing in the Surrogate’s Court. In Addition, Mr. Streng subsequently filed his own attorney affidavits in the Surrogate’s Court referencing and relying upon that fraudulent assignment.

13. Irrefutable evidence exists of collusion between the state actors, state agencies, and certain “influential” lawyers who sought to improperly profit at my expense, and who have damaged me and violated various federally protected rights. The lawyers against whom damages are sought had numerous ethical complaints filed, all of which asserted similar violations of the mandatory disciplinary regulations. But they were protected by Corrupt NYS Attorney Ethics bodies.

14. Testimony before this Honorable Court in Anderson, began the process of unmasking State employees, and others, who have improperly acted under the color of law. Without a fair and objective trial in U.S. District Court of the substantive Constitutional and Civil Rights issues, including demonstration of offenses with the evidence, systemic State corruption becomes Law of the Land, superior to all Constitutionally guaranteed rights and contrary to all U.S. Codes.

15. The actions of the defendants violate my equal rights and other guaranteed rights that are explicitly protected by the U.S. Constitution and U.S. laws cited in the complaint and herein. Such violations are federal questions correctly before this U.S. District Court. The Eleventh Amendment no longer applies as the new fact of action by state actors without jurisdiction is now known to this Honorable Court.

16. I respectfully requesting that in addition to re-opening the instant case, that the Honorable Court sua sponte appoint a federal monitor to oversee the day-to-day operations of the New York State Attorney and Judicial Ethics bodies for an indefinite period of time.

Continuing Evidence of Plaintiff’s Allegations of Widespread Corruption

17. Plaintiff also respectfully renews the request for this Honorable Court to immediately schedule a hearing to take the testimony of two New York State judges, and who at all times have wanted to appear before this Court to discuss the widespread corruption as herein alleged. (The Judges’ affidavits are attached hereto as EXHIBIT “D” and EXHIBIT “E”)

18. Taking all the allegations in plaintiff’s Amended Complaint as true, plaintiff has properly alleged that the individual defendants acted in numerous instances to deprive plaintiff of his constitutional rights to due process, equal protection of the law, and other constitutional violations. Because these individual defendants are state actors, and have blatantly used “the badge[s] of their authority to deprive [plaintiff] of [his] federally guaranteed rights” under the United States Constitution, § 1983 is the vehicle by which plaintiff may seek and obtain his much-needed relief. Wyatt, 504 U.S. at 161.

Because § 1983 is a federal statute, this Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate plaintiff’s claims. And because it is now known that the state actors knowingly acted without jurisdiction, this case is now ripe for immediate discovery and trial.

19. Indeed, just like this federal court, the courts of New York State (including the DDC) are entrusted with the responsibility of adjudicating the merits of cases without self-dealing, corruption, and illegality.

However, plaintiff’s complaint states that such courts have not so performed their duties; rather, plaintiff’s complaint alleges numerous acts of corruption, illegal activity, and obstruction of justice in the operation of the courts of New York State.

Given that the allegations in plaintiff’s complaint are taken as true, plaintiff’s allegations state legitimate claims for relief, and ones now known to have been void of any immunity.

20. Indeed, because this Court has already stated that the DDC is “an arm” of the NY State Courts, and is “the court” itself, plaintiff maintains that he merely requested an unbiased, fair and honest court system to adjudicate his claims. Simply put, plaintiff simply requested that the courts of New York State honestly do their job.

Plaintiff has alleged that he was deprived of this very basic right, which necessarily deprived him of his right to due process of law, a free and fair court system, and the right to petition his government. These constitutional violations demand federal redress, and plainly provide this Court with federal jurisdiction.

21. The United States Constitution does permit this Court to review the decisions of the EMPLOYEES of New York State (and other lawyers).

The Supreme Court found in Jett v. Dallas Independent School_District (491 U.S. 701 (1989)), that 42 U.S.C. §1981 by its terms prohibits private discrimination as well as discrimination under color of state law.

The Court considered whether §1981 created a private right of action to enforce that prohibition against state actors.

The Court concluded that, “the express cause of action for damages created by §1983 constitutes the exclusive federal remedy for violation of the rights guaranteed in §1981 by state governmental units.” (Id. at 720-721, 733).

22. “A plaintiff may sue a state official acting in his official capacity - notwithstanding the Eleventh Amendment - for prospective, injunctive relief from violations of federal law.” (Opinion and Order, p36). And as now known, the Eleventh Amendment does not apply here.

23. The U.S. Supreme Court in Scheuer v. Rhodes (416 U.S. 232 (1974)) held: “The Eleventh Amendment does not in some circumstances bar an action for damages against a state official charged with depriving a person of a federal right under color of state law, and the District Court acted prematurely and hence erroneously in dismissing the complaints as it did without affording petitioners any opportunity by subsequent proof to establish their claims.”

24. Further in Scheuer v Rhodes, the Court noted “If the immunity is qualified, [416 U.S. 232, 243] not absolute, the scope of that immunity will necessarily be related to facts as yet not established either by affidavits, admissions, or a trial record.

Final resolution of this question must take into account the functions and responsibilities of these particular defendants in their capacities as officers of the state government, as well as the purposes of 42 U.S.C. 1983″. Now known is the fact that even qualified immunity cannot now be asserted as jurisdiction had been stripped.

25. “[G]overnment officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” (Harlow v. Fitzgerald (1982) 457 U.S. 800, 818 [73 L.Ed.2d 396, 410]). Here, state actors knew they lacked jurisdiction.

26. I assert violations of civil rights and other rights of which so-called “legal professionals” “would have known”. The state actors and the “legal professionals” also should have known that their jurisdiction had been stayed upon the death of an interested party.

I also asserted evidence to demonstrate that such violations of guaranteed rights are planned, intentional, and organized for profit to the chosen few who are lawyers and officials benefiting at my expense. I also assert that discovery would further verify the civil and criminal allegations made by me are already confirmed as plausible.

27. Title 42 U.S.C. §1988 in relevant part confers on the district courts “protection of all person in the United States in their civil rights, and for their vindication, shall be exercised and enforced in conformity with the laws of the United States, so far as such laws are suitable to carry the same into effect; but in all cases where they are not adapted to the object, or are deficient in the provisions necessary to furnish suitable remedies and punish offenses against law, the common law, as modified and changed by the constitution and statutes of the State wherein the court having jurisdiction of such civil or criminal cause is held, so far as the same is not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States, shall be extended to and govern the said courts in the trial and disposition of the cause” (emphasis added).

28. This Court was not asked to review State of New York court decisions. The acts, without jurisdiction, of State employees were described to demonstrate such actions resulted in the conspiracy against my rights.

Title 42 U.S.C. §1985 (2) applies to obstructing justice; intimidating a party, or witness if “two or more persons in any State … conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State”.

29. In Zahrey v. City of New York, (No. 98 Civ. 4546(LAP), 1999), on a motion to dismiss, the District Court dismissed the claims against defendant Coffey on the ground of qualified immunity.

Without determining whether a prosecutor’s fabrication of evidence violated a constitutional right, this Court ruled that Coffey was entitled to qualified immunity because “the law was not `clearly established’ in 1996 that a prosecutor’s fabrication of evidence violated a person’s constitutional rights.”

30. On appeal to the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, (Zahrey v. Coffey, No. 99-9119), this Court’s dismissal was reversed and remanded: “We hold that there is a constitutional right not to be deprived of liberty as a result of the fabrication of evidence by a government officer acting in an investigatory capacity, at least where the officer foresees that he himself will use the evidence with a resulting deprivation of liberty. … [W]e conclude that the allegations of the complaint suffice to indicate that a qualified immunity defense may not be sustained without further development of the facts.”

31. In Gloria Perez, et. al v. Jesus Ortiz, et. al, 849 F. 2d 793 (2nd Cir. 1988), the court, “held that the district court erred in dismissing the claims sua sponte without giving plaintiffs notice and an opportunity to be heard, and abused its discretion in dismissing the official capacity suits against appellees without giving appellants an opportunity to amend their complaints to conform to the requirements for such a suit.”

ROOKER-FELDMAN DOCTRINE IS INAPPLICABLE

32. There are not State proceedings dealing with the issues raised in Plaintiff’s complaint, or with these Defendants; the relief sought (injunctive relief against the state and money damages against individuals) has not been sought in State courts. This District Court has not been asked to change any State decisions.

Plaintiff’s complaint does not concern actions properly “judicial in nature” since Plaintiff asserts lack of Eleventh Amendment Immunity and the fact that acts by individuals beyond the legal limits of their official positions occurred, thereby harming Plaintiff by deprivation of substantive and material guaranteed rights under U.S. laws.

33. The Supreme Court case of Exxon Mobil Corn. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. (544 U.S. 280 (2005)) clearly shows that claim preclusion is a separate doctrine entirely. In Exxon the requisite elements that must be met for the Rooker-Feldman doctrine to apply are defined as:

(a) First: The case must be brought in District Court by a party that has already lost in state court.

(b) Second: The injury claimed must be as a result of the judgment itself. There is no “judgment” in my case. The complaint in District Court concerns on-going abuse of civil rights under color of state law without jurisdiction, or state authority, by state employees and other lawyers causing damages to Plaintiff;

(c) Third: A final judgment on the state court proceeding must have already been rendered before the federal action is brought. This does not apply here.

(d) Fourth: The federal case must invite review and rejection of the state law claim; if the claims are not identical, the Federal claim must be inextricably intertwined with the state law claim, so as to implicate common facts pertaining to the same transaction or occurrence. (District of Columbia Court of Anneals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462,483 n. 16 (1983)).

This does not apply to my case. Since official corruption causing deprivation of civil rights was not part of any State proceeding, there was no previous injury from judgment since there was no final State court judgment, therefore Rooker-Feldman does not apply.

STANDING

34. I asserts widespread and systemic corruption by State employees acting in violation of their oaths of office and without jurisdiction. I believe that such abuses of official positions should be immediately stopped by injunctive relief and by appointing a Federal Monitor.

35. Three tests determine if a would-be plaintiff has standing: the litigant must show: (a) that he has suffered personally some actual or threatened injury; (b) that the injury must be fairly traceable to the alleged illegal conduct of the defendant, and (c) that the injury must likely be redressed by a favorable decision.

(Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, 454 U.S. 464, 472 (1982)). Causation and redressability are required (Simon v. Eastern Ky. Welfare Rights Org., 426 U.S. 26, 38, 41-43 (1976)). The Supreme Court has referred to the “injury-in fact” standard as the “irreducible minimum” required by the Constitution.

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 8, 9 & 12

36. My complaint presented substantive facts without “bald assertions”. Such facts, must be taken as true (Opinion and Order, p.30). The revelations of organized and systemic corruption substantiates the statements that might have been otherwise labeled implausible.

The now-known lack of jurisdiction confirms the planned, improper and damaging actions by the defendants against me. Discovery will further substantiate the preliminary facts asserted. I made statements of fact and attempted to provide enough details (pursuant to Rules 8, 9, and 12) to demonstrate that the claims were not speculative and should not be summarily dismissed sua sponte without discovery.

37. I have state and federal constitutional rights of, inter alai, due process, which has been undisputedly denied me, and which begs this courts intervention.

38. Finally, and also new to this Honorable Court, are the words of the Honorable Joseph W. Bellacosa, former Judge of the New York State Court of Appeals and Chief Administrative Judge of the New York State Court System (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT “F”) .

Judge Bellacosa asks, “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” (Who will watch the watchdogs?”) Briefly, Judge Bellacosa speaks directly to the need of this Court to take immediate and substantive action regarding the federal violations of law by New York State actors, and as herein complained of by plaintiff.

39. WHEREFORE, based on the facts, new information, fraud upon this court and the decisions cited above, plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court: grant the requested motion, REOPEN the instant 08cv2391 case, direct the Clerk of the Court to return the case to active status, and appoint a federal monitor to review the herein allegations and any and all such asserted allegations by those similarly situated.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

The undersigned declares under penalty of perjury that he is the plaintiff in the above action, that he has read the above and that the information contained therein is true and correct, 28 U.S.C. § 1746; 18 U.S.C § 1621.

Dated: New York, New York
September 11, 2010

Respectfully submitted,

KEVIN MCKEOWN
Kevin McKeown, Pro Se
P.O. Box 616, New York, New York 10156
(212) 591-1022 tel - kmck22333@aol.com

TO: ANDREW M. CUOMO

Attorney General of the State of New York
Attn: Anthony J. Tomari, Assistant Attorney General
120 Broadway, 24th Floor,New York, New York 10271

Joseph F. McQuade, Esq.,Michael D. McQuade, Esq.,McQuade & McQuade
390 Fifth Avenue – Room 711,New York, New York 10018

Comments to the Above:

Shira’s conscience said…

Shira, Shira, Shira. What say you?

What say you, Shira, to federal prosecutors?
Can’t hear you. Please speak up.
Wait. Just not yet.
First, think of your judicial oath.
Yeah, yeah. That’s it.
Then speak up.
And speak loudly Judge Shira Scheindlin.

September 16, 2010 12:54 PM


Anonymous said…

good comment. my thoughts exactly.

September 16, 2010 12:59 PM


Anonymous said…

you see, there’s always a silver lining. sherry can now go drinking with the former chief counsel drunk- cahill, forget his first name right now, think it was shotglass. yeah, SHOTGLASS CAHILL.

September 16, 2010 1:21 PM


Anonymous said…

Sherry’s not alone. The rumor is that about 8 lawyers are leaving the DDC. Friedberg’s been acting especially paranoid lately. Maybe he should start drinking and take over where Sherry left off. Dont’ forget that Alan’s a corrupt chump like Sherry, actually bigger in some area.

September 16, 2010 1:37 PM


Anonymous said…

Does anyone see how sad all this is? Does anyone see these orders for these people to commit such hainous acts must have come from above and now they are all afraid……..sad……I thought her name was
Seltzer Cahill!One Seltzerra
Two Seltzerra
Three Seltzerra

FLOOR!

September 16, 2010 1:47 PM


Anonymous said…

Are the other litigants who had their cases thrown out going to refile?If there are more cases attacking these individuals and their corrupt actions, it should provide more evidence of a pervasive, systematic and long term pattern of corruption.Maybe then the DOJ will take action.

September 16, 2010 1:55 PM


LE said…

Sherry Cohen, Thomas Cahill, Naomi Goldstein, Alan Friedberg, David Spokany, all need to go directly to Jail!! Hey, do any of you guys know Attorney Allen H. Isaac, Esq. (GOD). I’m sure you do!!!!! How much did he pay you guys to protect him?ALLEN H. ISAAC, Esq. (Docket No: 2005.3074).

Isaac is a SEXUAL PREDATOR, WHO COMMITTED FELONY LEVEL CRIMES, received a mere slap on the wrist by the Appellate Court, First Dept. What a freaking JOKE that was!!!Court transcripts were altered, they withheld crucial evidence, they tampered with evidence.. and denied Esposito an attorney during the disciplinary hearings against Allen Isaac!!!

Naomi Goldstein, Esq. was promoted soon after the disciplinary proceedings against Allen Isaac. I’m sure she was handsomely rewarded for protecting him!!!!

Hey, what a stinking minute…How the HELL did the Appellate Court, First Department RULE on Allen H. Isaac’s fate in the first place when they are TOTALLY CONFLICTED!!!! Didn’t they hear Esposito’s A/V DVD tape?

September 16, 2010 2:17 PM


WOW said…

JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN NEEDS TO DO THE RIGHT THING FOR ALL THE RELATED CASES…RE-OPEN THEM IS THE ONLY RIGHT THING TO DO..AND ASAP!!GOOD LUCK TO KEVIN MCKEOWN, ANDERSON, ESPOSITO, STEPHEN LAMONT, ELIOT BERNSTEIN, CAPOGROSSO, MCCORMICK, CARVEL, ETC……….

MAYBE NOW THEY’LL FINALLY DO THE RIGHT THING..JUDGE, THE WRITING IS ON THE WALL….CRIMES, CRIMES, CRIMES….JUSTICE, JUSTICE, JUSTICE!!!!!!JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN CAN YOU HEAR US!!!!!!!!

September 16, 2010 2:23 PM


Anonymous said…

Luisa C. Esposito, Plaintiff, pro-se, filed her motion to reopen her FEDERAL COMPLAINT (07- Civ-11612 (SAS),last week. The Court issued an Order directing her defendants to reply by Sept. 17, 2010..DO YOU THINK they’re getting nervous?HOW and WHY did Esposito and the related cases get dismissed?

September 16, 2010 2:36 PM


T Finnan said…

Notice,the attorney for most of the defendants is Andrew Cuomo. Notice that many of the acts are federal and state crimes. Note that Andrew Cuomo has used NY State funds and employees to defend criminal acts. Did Andrew Cuomo obstruct Justice by interceding to defend criminal acts by some defendants?

Andrew Cuomo’s duty is to defend NY State interests and not the criminal acts by State employees.Luke 16:13 “No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon.”Andrew Cuomo, you cannot serve the People of NY and Mammon’s corrupt NY courts.

September 16, 2010 6:41 PM

Anonymous said…

I don’t get it. Cuomo only serves one master. Himself.

September 16, 2010 7:32 PM


Eliot Bernstein Iviewit Inventor said…

Where are the beefy exhibits Frank E Baby? Anyone got beef with my hero Scheindlin for what she already did for you all by having Anderson sing death lullaby to Cahill, Sherry, AG Cuomo, Spookany, etc. must take it up with me, her soon to be Supreme Court chauffeur.

You never know what gun is put to the head of those who do the right thing immediately after and what it may cause them to do after, like gun to granddaughter head can be swaying to some but you can never forget that pristine moment of heroism.

You must worship it forever, despite what the future holds. Now be prepared in that scenario of Scheindlin acting off to fire off complaints against her if she does not follow the law but file them with love and pain, as I do with Catherine Wolfe and others.

To all those waiting for her, stop and do something bold with what is already before you, be proactive stop waiting for Frank or Shira or Cuomo, fire off some criminal complaints against all those Anderson fingered with everybody, the more the merrier.

And to those most unethical ethics officers who have cast an evil upon this land filled with pain and suffering and death, take comfort that I, Eliot and I A-m That I A-m have a special place for you in hell. I personally will be your eternal tour guide, if you think my writing is long wait until you hear my voice eternally damning you, 24.7.Eternally. Ask Cahill if his soul has been sucked from his being, ask him my name and you will see fear.

Sherry K. Cohen, I already have sucked the lifeblood from your soul. Remember me in Scheindlin’s court, the devilish looking angel that your eyes were fixated upon? Your breath sucked dry, as I sat directly in front of your lying and evil soulless body, remember the conversation that only you could hear?

I already hear your prayers, your whiney begging and know they will not be answered as that conversation was had, the jury out. This sentence will be long, slow and eternally painful, you will pray more and more for swift death but the beginning is now, death will not help, it is when the fun with you really begins.

Your Travel Guide to Hell
Bat Out of Hell
Mad Inventor
Eliot Ivan Bernstein

September 16, 2010 7:37 PM


Anonymous said…

Is this guy Bernstein for real????

September 16, 2010 7:51 PM


Anonymous said…

of course Eliot is real, read the last three salutations again, therein lies your answer!

September 16, 2010 8:02 PM


CLICK HERE TO SEE FILED DOCUMENT WITH EXHIBITS